Idiot theist

     We full skeptics can declaim that due to lack of referents, as each of the naturalist, especially the empirical or the teleonomic alone, arguments hold  and His attributes are incoherent and contradictory, God cannot  possibly exist!
      We can take the burden of proof in that we can affirm [Google:] ontological naturalism- the presumption of naturalism.
        What is your take?